Abstract
This panel focuses on alternate ratings and their impact on traditional ratings. The panel addresses where rating agency performance fell short and where did it not; how investors view ratings and rating agencies and what are they looking for now from rating agencies; how Rule 17g-5 has changed the competitive landscape in the ratings business; other key issues arising from the U.S. SEC’s rule-making process on ratings; a proposed rotational system for assigning ratings; whether regulators should assign ratings; how effective the NAIC/PIMCO model has been; how the rating agencies are and should be addressing conflicts of interest; whether there are other viable rating models; and market-based ratings.
- © 2012 Pageant Media Ltd
Don’t have access? Register today to begin unrestricted access to our database of research.
Log in using your username and password
In this issue
Jump to section
- Article
- Abstract
- RATING AGENCY PERFORMANCE VARIED BY SECTOR OF THE STRUCTURED FINANCE UNIVERSE
- HOW DO INVESTORS LOOK AT RATINGS NOW?
- HAS RULE 17G-5 CHANGED THE COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE FOR THE RATINGS BUSINESS?
- VIEWS ON THE OTHER RECENTLY PROPOSED SEC RULES FOR THE RATING AGENCIES
- WHAT IS YOUR VIEW ON THE PROPOSAL TO ROTATE RATING ASSIGNMENTS ACROSS THE AGENCIES?
- SHOULD REGULATORS ASSIGN RATINGS? HOW EFFECTIVE HAS THE NAIC/PIMCO MODEL BEEN?
- CONFLICTS OF INTEREST AND HOW TO ADDRESS THEM
- OTHER RATING MODELS (E.G., MARKET-BASED RATINGS)
- CONCLUSIONS
- REFERENCES
- Info & Metrics
- PDF (Subscribers Only)
- PDF (Subscribers Only)
Similar Articles
Cited By...
- No citing articles found.