Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Videos
  • Submit an article
  • More
    • About JSF
    • Editorial Board
    • Published Ahead of Print (PAP)
  • IPR Logo
  • About Us
  • Journals
  • Publish
  • Advertise
  • Videos
  • Webinars
  • More
    • Awards
    • Article Licensing
    • Academic Use
  • Follow IIJ on LinkedIn
  • Follow IIJ on Twitter

User menu

  • Sample our Content
  • Request a demo
  • Log in

Search

  • ADVANCED SEARCH: Discover more content by journal, author or time frame
The Journal of Structured Finance
  • IPR Logo
  • About Us
  • Journals
  • Publish
  • Advertise
  • Videos
  • Webinars
  • More
    • Awards
    • Article Licensing
    • Academic Use
  • Sample our Content
  • Request a demo
  • Log in
The Journal of Structured Finance

The Journal of Structured Finance

ADVANCED SEARCH: Discover more content by journal, author or time frame

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Videos
  • Submit an article
  • More
    • About JSF
    • Editorial Board
    • Published Ahead of Print (PAP)
  • Follow IIJ on LinkedIn
  • Follow IIJ on Twitter

Assessing the Evolution of CMBS Underwriting

Tracy Chen
The Journal of Structured Finance Summer 2018, 24 (2) 34-44; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3905/jsf.2018.1.066
Tracy Chen
is a portfolio manager and head of structured credit at Brandywine Global Investment Management in Philadelphia, PA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF (Subscribers Only)
Loading

Click to login and read the full article.

Don’t have access? Click here to request a demo 
Alternatively, Call a member of the team to discuss membership options
US and Overseas: +1 646-931-9045
UK: 0207 139 1600

Abstract

It is almost a consensus opinion that we are late in the innings of the CRE (Commercial Real Estate) market cycle, given the length and strength of recovery since the Global Financial Crisis. One of the key triggers of the previous crisis was the loosening of underwriting standards with risk layering. Albeit the underwriting standards should be designed to enable lenders to identify and mitigate credit risks, cycles of underwriting standards are a function of competitive landscape of the origination market, interest rate environment, and borrower demand. This article aims to answer three questions: How did the underwriting standards evolve since the financial crisis, especially under the new regulations on risk retention? Have the underwriting standards loosened enough to trigger another crisis? How can CMBS investors position for the current CRE credit cycle?

TOPICS: CMBS and commercial mortgage loans, financial crises and financial market history, real estate

  • © 2018 Pageant Media Ltd
View Full Text

Don’t have access? Click here to request a demo

Alternatively, Call a member of the team to discuss membership options

US and Overseas: +1 646-931-9045

UK: 0207 139 1600

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?
PreviousNext
Back to top

Explore our content to discover more relevant research

  • By topic
  • Across journals
  • From the experts
  • Monthly highlights
  • Special collections

In this issue

The Journal of Structured Finance: 24 (2)
The Journal of Structured Finance
Vol. 24, Issue 2
Summer 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on The Journal of Structured Finance.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Assessing the Evolution of CMBS Underwriting
(Your Name) has sent you a message from The Journal of Structured Finance
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the The Journal of Structured Finance web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Assessing the Evolution of CMBS Underwriting
Tracy Chen
The Journal of Structured Finance Jul 2018, 24 (2) 34-44; DOI: 10.3905/jsf.2018.1.066

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Save To My Folders
Share
Assessing the Evolution of CMBS Underwriting
Tracy Chen
The Journal of Structured Finance Jul 2018, 24 (2) 34-44; DOI: 10.3905/jsf.2018.1.066
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Tweet Widget Facebook Like LinkedIn logo

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ASSESSING THE TRENDS IN THE COMPETITIVENESS OF THE ORIGINATION LANDSCAPE
    • ASSESSING THE MIXED PICTURE OF CMBS UNDERWRITING STANDARD EVOLUTION
    • CONCLUSION AND CMBS MARKET OUTLOOK
    • RELATIVE VALUE AND INVESTMENT THEMES IN CMBS
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF (Subscribers Only)
  • PDF (Subscribers Only)

Similar Articles

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar
LONDON
One London Wall, London, EC2Y 5EA
United Kingdom
+44 207 139 1600
 
NEW YORK
41 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10010
USA
+1 646 931 9045
pm-research@pageantmedia.com
 

Stay Connected

  • Follow IIJ on LinkedIn
  • Follow IIJ on Twitter

MORE FROM PMR

  • Home
  • Awards
  • Investment Guides
  • Videos
  • About PMR

INFORMATION FOR

  • Academics
  • Agents
  • Authors
  • Content Usage Terms

GET INVOLVED

  • Advertise
  • Publish
  • Article Licensing
  • Contact Us
  • Subscribe Now
  • Log In
  • Update your profile
  • Give us your feedback

© 2022 Pageant Media Ltd | All Rights Reserved | ISSN: 1551-9783 | E-ISSN: 2374-1325

  • Site Map
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Cookies
  • Privacy Policy